 |
| Johnathon, James. "Raccoon is Excited...". 11/22/12 via inquisitr. |
I edited Emily's Podcast and completed this rubric.
I edited Payton's QRG and completed this rubric.
What I Learned About my Project
- Editing another QRG gave me a better idea of how to organize my own in a more effective way. I was also able to see the effect of more personal pictures and quotes on the overall text.
- Editing a project done in a different genre gave me a better idea of what the purpose of the project is.
Top 3 Issues
- I need to add more pictures! I have decided to add the following pictures to my own draft:
- Of the residents working at UW
- Seattle City Council
- UW Administration
- I need to analyze more deeply how the different stakeholders make their claims and whether or not their claims are valid.
- I need to increase my credibility by adding more sources or organizing my QRG more effectively to better show the progression of the issue.
Top 3 Strengths
- Good array and organization of hyperlinks
- Address all sides of issue, which helps establish credibility
- Explain issue in simple terms and have engaging personal stories about individual residents (which I should continue to build upon)
Plan of Action to Improve
- I need to rethink the organizational structure of my QRG. I should play around with columns, headers, themes, fonts, sizes, picture locations. I need to make it more aesthetically pleasing.
- I should reread a couple sources and add more information on how the stakeholders make their claims and if they are valid. I also need to research the more political side.
- I need to include a better, more detailed introduction that stimulates the five senses.
Even though my first draft is completed, there is still a lot to be done!
Do you have any tricks for formatting a QRG?
No comments:
Post a Comment